A Case Study of Hawai‘i Community Development Authority’s Workforce Housing Regulations

In this report, we examine whether individuals earning 100-140% AMI continue to benefit from 801 South Street and whether the 2018 rule revisions partially explain why there have been no projects like 801 South Street built since.

Our takeaway: If the state of Hawai‘i and HCDA truly care about creating more housing for Hawai‘i’s workers and ensuring Kaka‘ako’s future as a vibrant, local community, we highly recommend they reconsider current regulations regarding buyback restrictions and equity sharing and reinstate Title 15, Subchapter 4, Chapter 218.

Previous
Previous

Exploring 3D Printed and Modular Homes as Solutions to Hawai‘i’s Housing Crisis

Next
Next

Deed Restrictions in Maui County